The Online Background Checking Site

Kentucky school volunteers to pay for background checks

May 20th, 2012

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Volunteers at Kentucky schools will likely have to pay $10 for a criminal background check if they want to continue helping out in the coming school year.

The new fee goes into effect July 1. Administrative Office of the Courts Director Laurie Dudgeon told The Courier-Journal the new fee is the result of state budget cuts by the Kentucky General Assembly.

Dudgeon said the state processed more than 217,000 criminal records reports for schools statewide last year.

School officials say they likely have little choice but to pass on the cost to prospective volunteers who are relied on for everything from class aides to helping with school field trips.

NAACP Louisville branch president Raoul Cunningham says the fee will hurt low-income families from becoming involved in their child’s school.

___

Information from: The Courier-Journal, http://www.courier-journal.com

 

©2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Posted in Information | No Comments »


ID theft by sisters devastates woman

May 20th, 2012

By STEVEN REILLY

sreilly@njherald.com

SPARTA — When Rachel Mongiovi returned home in 2008 from a year of studying abroad, she was hoping to land her dream job as a civilian administrator at Picatinny Arsenal.

However, what she came home to was a nightmare that still haunts her today.

While Mongiovi was studying at the London Metropolitan University in England, back in New Jersey on Nov. 8, 2007, her sisters, Sarah Conklin, 30, and Jessica Mongiovi, 23, were stopped by Stanhope police on a traffic violation. The sisters conspired to use Rachel’s name to get out of trouble.

The police linked Rachel Mongiovi’s name, birth date and Social Security number as an alias to Conklin’s criminal record, which includes seven felonies. Now, any time a criminal background check is done on Rachel Mongiovi, her sister’s record comes up.

“It is like I don’t even exist,” said Mongiovi, 27. “I have no civil rights to protect me from this. I spent my whole life doing the right thing and working hard, and now I have a criminal record whenever I go for a job.”

In the 2007 incident, Jessica Mongiovi, the driver, told police she was Rachel Mongiovi and gave them Rachel’s birth date and Social Security number. According to police, Jessica did this to avoid charges for driving on a suspended license.

Police records show that Jessica Mongiovi, under Rachel’s name, was let go with a traffic ticket. Conklin was arrested on outstanding warrants and taken to the Sussex County Jail in Newton.

When Joseph Mongiovi, the father of the women, discovered the traffic violation against his daughter Rachel, he contacted the Stanhope Police Department and said Rachel was out of the country on that date and could not have been the driver.

Stanhope Police Sgt. Charles Zweigle investigated the claim by the women’s father, and interviewed Jessica and Sarah.

According to a Stanhope Police Department arrest record dated Dec. 1, 2007, Jessica and Sarah confessed to using Rachel’s name because “they knew Rachel’s license was clean.”

Jessica and Sarah were arrested and ultimately convicted of giving false information to police. Because of the nature of the crime, Rachel Mongiovi’s name, birth date and Social Security number were listed as an alias to her sister Sarah’s criminal record, which includes seven felonies.

Stanhope Police Chief Steven Pittigher said that when the sisters were arrested, the complaints went to the prosecutor’s office with Rachel Mongiovi’s name on them. The charges against Rachel Mongiovi were dismissed, but the complaint still existed.

“The police department has very little control over the complaints that are sent to the prosecutor’s office,” Pittigher said. “There are some things (Mongiovi) can do, and we will do all we can to get her going in the right direction to clear her name, but it will be a matter for the court.”

Mongiovi tried to fix the mixup right away. She appealed to the Stanhope Police Department. She pleaded with the Sussex County Prosecutor’s Office to take her sister’s criminal past off her record.

But all she got after five years of begging was a letter from the prosecutor’s office stating: “Rachel Mongiovi was considered by this office to be the innocent victim of crimes committed by her sisters. She was not a party to the crimes committed nor did she have any prior criminal history.”

But the criminal record from her sister still comes up when any potential employer does a background check on Mongiovi. Even with the letter, that red flag has made it difficult for her to get a job that relies on background checks as a qualifying factor.

Frustrated, defeated and lost, Mongiovi has given up on her dream job at Picatinny Arsenal for now.

“You have to have a clean record to even work in the base store. What are they going to do if I walk in there with seven felonies showing on my record? They are going to laugh at me,” she said.

That did not stop the graduate of Barton College in North Carolina and former intern for the British Parliament from applying to other jobs to help pay off her student loans and car insurance. But so far each place she has applied has turned her down.

“I went to Lowe’s, where I worked before I went away to college, to try to get one of the five jobs they had advertised, but I was told they had all been filled,” Mongiovi said. “I even applied to work as a sales clerk at Dale’s Jewelry in the mall, but they made me take an honesty quiz after my record came up, and I still didn’t get the job.”

Mongiovi did find some sympathy from a recruiter for a temp agency who accepted her explanation of her criminal record and hired her for clerical work, but the jobs last only a few weeks at a time.

“I have been devastated by this. I can’t find work in any of the fields I went to school for because of the background check,” Mongiovi said. “I have lost my car, I am behind in my loan payments and I have to move back with my family.”

Her parents have since moved out of the area and she is living with her grandparents.

She is not in contact with her sisters but wants them to get the help they need.

Meanwhile, she is seeking the help she needs to restore her own identity so she can find permanent employment.

But according to Barbara Lee, a professor at the School of Management and Labor Relations at Rutgers University, that will be an uphill battle.

“In this day and age, any criminal record equals no job for most job applicants,” Lee said. “Maybe (Mongiovi) can try to explain her situation, but employers are very exposed to lawsuits today. They don’t want to take any chances hiring someone with a criminal record. She is really stuck in a terrible spot.”

Lee said there are no laws in New Jersey that prevent employers from running a background check on applicants and then factoring the results into the application.

“She may have a chance to explain to a potential employer in advance,” Lee said. “But there is no law that says the employer has to take it into consideration. This is an issue that speaks to her civil rights as a victim and needs to be addressed at a constitutional law level.”

Mongiovi took her case to her local lawmakers to try to find a solution to the problem. State Sen. Steve Oroho and Assemblyman Gary Chiusano, both R-24th Dist., said their office was looking into any help they could provide Mongiovi.

“We learned of Rachel’s dilemma a few weeks ago, and I can empathize with what she is going through,” Chiusano said. “She is a victim, and we are going to take her concerns seriously.”

Oroho said his office has been in contact with the state Office of Legislative Services to begin to research how a person can be exposed to this type of identity theft.

“We are looking to specifically address Rachel’s issues and find out if this is not covered by any statute on the books,” Oroho said. “If it turns out victims are vulnerable to this, we will address it.”

One common piece of advice that has been passed on to Mongiovi by anyone who has been asked about this issue is this: Get a lawyer.

“Everyone has told me to go see an attorney, but the ones I go to don’t want the case, or they are too expensive. I can’t get a job to pay for a lawyer to clear my name so I can get a job. It is like a nightmare I can’t wake up from, and it starts fresh each and every day,” Mongiovi said.

“I went to college and studied how great government could be, and how it could help the people in need,” she said. “But after going through this, I don’t think that way anymore.”

Mongiovi has contacted the Seton Hall Law School Law Clinic and the Rutgers Law School Law Clinic to try to resolve the civil rights violations that she said have made it impossible to use her degree in political science and history to land a job.

“Everyone I have talked to has told me that there is nothing they can do. The most ironic thing is that I was the victim of a crime and I am being punished for it,” Mongiovi said. “Everyone says that I need to put out more money to clear this up, but where are my civil rights? They don’t seem to exist here.”

 

Posted in Information | No Comments »


Everify Background Check

May 18th, 2012

everify.jolonisa-tech-world.com everify . Check out my everify background check video and discover how everify background check can help you get answers to your questions on a person’s background from the best industry and governmental information directories in existence. everify background check everify background check is a membership site which allows you to -locate important information about people -have access to a criminal record database that is second to none! -locate an old friend, a long lost family member, or a simply look up an unfamiliar phone number you can do it all with our People Search feature. Make sure you watch my video above for the full story! You can grab your free everify background check here: everify.jolonisa-tech-world.com Thanks for checking out this everify background check video

Posted in Videos | No Comments »


Ky. school volunteers to pay for background checks

May 18th, 2012






Volunteers at Kentucky schools will likely have to pay $10 for a criminal background check if they want to continue helping out in the coming school year.


The new fee goes into effect July 1. Administrative Office of the Courts Director Laurie Dudgeon told The Courier-Journal the new fee is the result of state budget cuts by the Kentucky General Assembly.


Dudgeon said the state processed more than 217,000 criminal records reports for schools statewide last year.


School officials say they likely have little choice but to pass on the cost to prospective volunteers who are relied on for everything from class aides to helping with school field trips.


NAACP Louisville branch president Raoul Cunningham says the fee will hurt low-income families from becoming involved in their child’s school.


(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Posted in Information | No Comments »


Kentucky school volunteers to pay for background checks

May 18th, 2012

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Volunteers at Kentucky schools will likely have to pay $10 for a criminal background check if they want to continue helping out in the coming school year.

The new fee goes into effect July 1. Administrative Office of the Courts Director Laurie Dudgeon told The Courier-Journal the new fee is the result of state budget cuts by the Kentucky General Assembly.

Dudgeon said the state processed more than 217,000 criminal records reports for schools statewide last year.

School officials say they likely have little choice but to pass on the cost to prospective volunteers who are relied on for everything from class aides to helping with school field trips.

NAACP Louisville branch president Raoul Cunningham says the fee will hurt low-income families from becoming involved in their child’s school.

___

Information from: The Courier-Journal, http://www.courier-journal.com

 

©2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Posted in Information | No Comments »


Readers react to Vassar Public Schools' background check policy

May 16th, 2012

VASSAR, MI — Last night the Vassar Public Schools Board of Education granted a local father’s appeal after a district policy prevented him from accompanying his son a field trip last week.

Chad Hunkins, 37, applied to be a chaperone for his son’s first grade class field trip but was denied because a mandatory background check revealed a felony conviction from almost 20 years ago.

Prior to Monday night’s board of education meeting, held at Vassar High School, 220 Atheletic St., MLive.com readers shared a variety of opinions about the school district’s initial decision and policy on background checking.

Some supported the initial ruling, saying the school district needs to keep safety a priority no matter what the circumstances. Spartanshoes said:

I am sure Hunkins is now an upstanding member of society, and a great father, etc etc. But the fact of the matter is, if he were to do something ‘bad’ during this field trip, and it came out later that the school knowingly sent a convicted felon on a field trip, there would be a community uproar and the administrators would certainly lose their jobs. They are simply covering their behinds and its hard to blame them.

Others, however, said Hunkins trying do his duty as a father and his past should not affect that. Lucky O’Toole said:

I don’t personally know this man, but it seems that he’s trying to be a good dad and be involved. We all know about absent fathers and here’s a guy who WANTS to be in his son’s life. Good on him. If he’s been in no trouble since 1993, I think the school should reconsider.

Another commenter, AJ said:

This is utter stupidity. That is why we need reform. CERTAIN one time felonies should be expunged automatically after 10 years, and Michigan needs a more liberal pardon and expungement policy.

Tell us how you feel and take our poll:

 

Posted in Information | No Comments »


Oklahoma governor signs open-carry gun bill

May 16th, 2012

OKLAHOMA CITY (Reuters) – Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin signed into law on Tuesday a bill that will allow Oklahomans to openly carry guns if they pass a criminal background check and take firearms training.

Fallin, a Republican, said the new law “sends a strong message that Oklahoma values the rights of its citizens to defend themselves, their family and their property.”

Oklahoma already issues licenses that allowed citizens to carry concealed weapons if they pass a criminal background check and undergo training.

The new law, which goes into effect November 1, expands the rights of permit-holders to openly carry guns and also allows citizens to carry firearms, either openly or concealed, without a license if they are on their own property.

Oklahoma becomes the 25th state with either “permissive open carry” laws (no permit required) or “licensed open carry” (permit required), according to the governor’s office.

It joins Utah, North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Indiana, Tennessee, Georgia, Mississippi, New Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Hawaii and Massachusetts as a “licensed open carry” state.

Businesses in Oklahoma may continue to ban firearms from their premises under the new law, which also prohibits the carrying of firearms on properties owned or leased by the city, state or federal government, at corrections facilities, in schools or college campuses, liquor stores and at sports arenas during sporting events.

(Editing by Corrie MacLaggan and Lisa Shumaker)

Posted in Information | No Comments »


Want a carry permit?

May 14th, 2012

People who want a permit to carry firearms must be at least 21 years old, pass a background check and obtain the approval of the county sheriff or the chief of police, if the person lives in Philadelphia.

The person will be asked to submit an application along with a fee.

Then, the sheriff will complete a background check, and may deny the permit if there is reason to believe the applicant’s character and reputation are such that he or she would be likely to endanger public safety.

If the license is approved, it is good for five years, unless revoked.

State police want people to know a license to carry is different from a license to purchase, which also requires a background check.

Source: Pennsylvania State Police

Posted in Information | No Comments »


Schoolyard safety lapse

May 14th, 2012

Thousands of contractors avoid background checks.

Thousands of contractors avoid background checks. Photo: Michele Mossop

THOUSANDS of people who work in schools across Victoria have not undergone background checks to ensure they do not pose a threat to children.

An investigation by The Age has found that many contractors who work regularly within school grounds – such as waste removalists, maintenance workers, gardeners and technicians – are not asked to take the Working with Children Check, which screens people for criminal offences to protect children from sexual and physical harm.

Under Victorian law, people who have ”regular, direct, unsupervised” contact with children are required to have criminal background checks. The Working with Children Act defines ”direct contact” as physical contact, face-to-face oral communication or ”physically being within eyeshot” of a child.

The Victorian Waste Management Association, whose members collect bins from school grounds and sanitary waste from school toilets, recently asked the Department of Justice whether its members needed background checks.

In March, the department, on behalf of Attorney-General Robert Clark, advised the waste industry that it did not need to undergo checks.

This has caused confusion about which contractors need checks and which ones do not. Schools in Victoria typically have between 40 and 80 contractors on their books.

Greg Dawson, who co-runs a website used by 70 Victorian schools to manage their contractors, said the department’s exemption of the waste disposal industry could turn the checking system into a farce.

”How is child protection going to be effective if contractors in selective industries who work at child-related workplaces are given a blanket exclusion from the system?” he said.

Mr Dawson has about 1000 contractors on his books, but fewer than half have undergone Working with Children Checks – an indication that thousands of contractors across the system are not covered.

”While a few school contractors possess Working with Children Checks, the vast majority of contractors engaged by schools do not have them, nor have they ever been asked by schools to provide evidence of one,” said Mr Dawson, managing director of the website SAM4Schools.

When The Age approached the government about its policy on Working with Children Checks for contractors in schools it gave several different answers.

The Education Department said principals and managers should address the duties to be performed by contractors to determine whether they constitute ”child-related work”.

The department’s guidelines say: ”Contractors such as IT technicians, gardeners and maintenance officers may require a [check] as they are frequently in schools during normal school hours. Contractors such as cleaners [who] are often only in schools outside normal school hours, will not have contact with children and therefore may not require a [check].”

This was later clarified by department spokesman Stuart Teather who said: ”It’s a school-based responsibility to ensure all contractors on school grounds either have a current [check] or are otherwise supervised at all times and are not alone with children.”

But a spokeswoman for the Department of Justice later told The Age that while schools may adopt their own policies, ”these are not the requirements of the Working with Children legislation”.

Department spokeswoman Kathryn Duffy emphasised that people must have a check if they have ”regular, direct, unsupervised” contact with children.

It is understood the department believes that the term ”physically being within eyeshot” – as outlined in the act – is only one of a number of factors in determining whether someone should have to undergo a check.

In a joint statement issued to The Age, Mr Clark and Education Minister Martin Dixon said: ”Although the final decision in these matters rests with schools, it is important they exercise a common sense approach having regard to the intention of the legislation to apply to those who have regular, unsupervised contact with children.”

The department’s decision to exempt garbage collectors – and its possible flow-on to other contractors – may also have wider ramifications for contractors working in kindergartens and childcare centres.

Posted in Information | No Comments »


BACKGROUND CHECK: Wells Fargo Employee Fired

May 12th, 2012

Posted on: 10:28 pm, May 10, 2012, by Andy Fales

The story of a Milwaukee woman, fired by Wells Fargo for a crime she committed 40 years ago, has gained the attention of a national audience.  And a Des Moines woman says she can relate.

Wells Fargo says it was following new FDIC regulations when it performed an FBI fingerprint check on 58-year-old Yolanda Quesada.  The search turned up a shoplifting misdemeanor from 1972 and she was fired without severance. 

The same search turned up a 16-year-old burglary charge on a Des Moines woman, and although she says she`d been a model employee for ten years, Wells Fargo fired her last month. 

The woman says Wells Fargo performed two tests: she passed the 10-year background check but then was handed a letter when the results of the FBI test came in.

She says, “I knew my background check was clear and everything like that, but while we were filling out the forms online to go through this process, it asked `have you been convicted of a felony in the last ten years?` No, because it was 16 years ago.”

The FDIC law prohibits banks from continuing the employment of any person with a criminal record involving dishonesty or breach of trust. 

Wells Fargo did not return calls for comment.

Posted in Information | No Comments »